福州人，研究員，博士生導師?，F為中國科學(xué)院研究生院人文與社會(huì )科學(xué)學(xué)位委員會(huì )副主席、中國科學(xué)院心理研究所學(xué)位委員會(huì )主席，中國科學(xué)院心理研究所行為科學(xué)重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗室學(xué)術(shù)委員會(huì )副主任。Judgment and Decision Making期刊顧問(wèn)編輯。
教育背景：
1978年～1982年，在福州大學(xué)機械工程系獲工學(xué)士學(xué)位；1985年9月～1988年7月，在杭州大學(xué)（現浙江大學(xué)）心理系獲教育碩士學(xué)位；1991年4月～1994年5月，在澳大利亞新南威爾士大學(xué)（University of New South Wales）心理學(xué)院獲哲學(xué)博士學(xué)位。
工作經(jīng)歷：
1995～1996年任新南威爾士大學(xué)校長(cháng)專(zhuān)項基金博士后研究員，1997～1998 年任澳大利亞研究理事會(huì )（ARC）澳大利亞國家博士后研究員，1999～2002年任新加坡南洋理工大學(xué)南洋商學(xué)院助理教授，2003 年任澳門(mén)科技大學(xué)行政與管理學(xué)院助理教授。
“人類(lèi)在不確定條件下如何做出判斷和決策”是富有前景和重要意義的科學(xué)難題。從適應性行為的觀(guān)點(diǎn)來(lái)看，主流決策模型（包括Prospect Theory）所假定的補償性風(fēng)險決策過(guò)程是一個(gè)錯誤的共識，強調生態(tài)理性的研究將糾正這個(gè)似是而非的前提假設。我主要工作是發(fā)展了一個(gè)在確定、不確定及風(fēng)險狀態(tài)下的行為抉擇模型。這一抉擇模型有別與傳統的計算“最大或最小期望值”模型，它假定：左右人類(lèi)風(fēng)險決策行為的機制不是最大限度地追求某種形式的期望（expectation）值，而是某種形式上辨察選擇對象之間是否存在優(yōu)勢性（dominance）關(guān)系。該模型和隨后發(fā)表的一系列論文對決策行為提出了“齊當別”(Equate-to-differentiate theory: A coherent bi-choice model across certainty, uncertainty and risk)的抉擇見(jiàn)解。這些研究對經(jīng)典的風(fēng)險決策理論提出了有力質(zhì)疑（包括兩位諾貝爾經(jīng)濟獎獲得者Allais和Kahneman的觀(guān)點(diǎn)），引發(fā)了經(jīng)濟學(xué)和心理學(xué)研究者的專(zhuān)文評論(Carlin, 1996)和重復驗證（e.g., Bonini, Tentori & Rumiati, 2004; Colbert, Murray & Nieschwietz, 2009）,并寫(xiě)入教科書(shū)中（e.g., Bounded Rationality and Public Policy: A Perspective from Behavioural Economics/作者：Alistair Munro; Reframing organizations: artistry, choice, and leadership/作者：Lee G. Bolman,Terrence E. Deal; Communication Yearbook 30/作者：Christina S. Beck; Messung von Zahlungsbereitschaften bei industriellen Dienstleistungen/作者：Christian M. Niederauer）。我們的行為決策研究團隊借助大規模人群調查、情景模擬、實(shí)驗室實(shí)驗、眼動(dòng)記錄法、腦成像等技術(shù)系統探討不確定環(huán)境下決策的行為和神經(jīng)機制，為回答“風(fēng)險決策是否遵循補償性原則”這一問(wèn)題提供行為和神經(jīng)水平的理論基礎和實(shí)證證據。
2008、2010年中國科學(xué)院研究生院BHP Billiton導師科研獎；心理研究所2009年度“創(chuàng )新團隊”獎（30萬(wàn)）；2011年中國科學(xué)院優(yōu)秀研究生指導教師獎；2012年國家自然科學(xué)基金項目（NSFC：70671099）在結題后評估中被評為“特優(yōu)”；2012年中國科學(xué)院朱李月華優(yōu)秀教師獎（80名）；2013年北京市優(yōu)秀博士學(xué)位論文指導教師科研項目專(zhuān)項資助（20萬(wàn)）。
培養研究生獲獎情況
2013年中科院院長(cháng)獎、及各類(lèi)獎學(xué)金
第八屆華人心理學(xué)家學(xué)術(shù)研討會(huì )“華人心理學(xué)新秀獎”（共10名）劉洪志
2013年北京市優(yōu)秀博士學(xué)位論文（共59名/中科院2名）饒儷琳
2013年度中國科學(xué)院優(yōu)秀博士學(xué)位論文（共84名）饒儷琳
中國科學(xué)院院長(cháng)優(yōu)秀獎（共240名）蘇寅
2012年中科院院長(cháng)獎、及各類(lèi)獎學(xué)金
朱李月華優(yōu)秀博士生獎（非西部地區，共121名）饒儷琳
北京市普通高等學(xué)校優(yōu)秀畢業(yè)生 饒儷琳
中國科學(xué)院優(yōu)秀畢業(yè)生 饒儷琳
2011年中科院院長(cháng)獎、及各類(lèi)獎學(xué)金
首屆中國科學(xué)院研究生格致論壇二等獎（共11名）孫紅月
首屆中國科學(xué)院研究生格致論壇三等獎（共16名）杜雪蕾
2011年度中國科學(xué)院優(yōu)秀博士學(xué)位論文（共84名）孫彥
中國科學(xué)院院長(cháng)優(yōu)秀獎（共240名）饒儷琳
心理所所長(cháng)獎（共6名）饒儷琳
中國科學(xué)院寶潔優(yōu)秀研究生獎學(xué)金 饒儷琳
2010年中科院院長(cháng)獎、及各類(lèi)獎學(xué)金
中國科學(xué)院研究生院BHP Billiton 獎學(xué)金（共26名） 饒儷琳
中國科學(xué)院寶潔獎（共45名）畢研玲、李金珍
中國科學(xué)院院長(cháng)優(yōu)秀獎（共163名）李金珍
心理所所長(cháng)獎（共5名）李金珍
2010年度中國科學(xué)院優(yōu)秀博士學(xué)位論文提名獎（共100名）孫彥
2009年中科院院長(cháng)獎、及各類(lèi)獎學(xué)金
2009年首屆全國心理學(xué)博士生學(xué)術(shù)論壇優(yōu)秀論文評比一等獎 （共5名）饒儷琳
中科院院長(cháng)優(yōu)秀獎科研啟動(dòng)專(zhuān)項資金資助（10萬(wàn)）孫彥
“全國心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì )第二屆優(yōu)秀研究生論文”一等獎（共6名）孫紅月
朱李月華優(yōu)秀博士生獎（共300名）孫彥
2008年中科院院長(cháng)獎、及各類(lèi)獎學(xué)金
中國科學(xué)院院長(cháng)優(yōu)秀獎（共200名） 孫彥
劉永齡獎學(xué)金優(yōu)秀獎（共50名） 畢研玲
寶潔優(yōu)秀研究生獎學(xué)金獲獎?wù)撸ü?0名）孫彥
地奧獎學(xué)金獲獎?wù)撸ü?0名） 許潔虹
中國科學(xué)院研究生院BHP Billiton 獎學(xué)金（共25名） 許潔虹
2. 梁竹苑, 徐麗娟, 饒儷琳, 蔣田仔, & 李紓. (2012). “20%的概率獲得蛋糕”=“獲得蛋糕的20%”？檢驗風(fēng)險決策的期望法則假設. 科學(xué)通報[J]. 57(35): 3421–3433.
3. 付陽(yáng)，周媛，梁竹苑, & 李紓. (2012). 愛(ài)情的神經(jīng)生理機制. 科學(xué)通報[J]. 57(35): 3376–3383.
4. 梁竹苑, 周媛, 饒儷琳, & 李紓. (2012). 從行為決策到神經(jīng)經(jīng)濟學(xué)：一條研究演化之路. In 馬慶國 (Ed.), 中國神經(jīng)科學(xué)與社會(huì )科學(xué)交叉學(xué)科研究進(jìn)展. 北京: 科學(xué)出版社.
5. 汪祚軍, 李紓. (2012). 不確定性決策違背“確定事件原則”的心理機制再探. 應用心理學(xué), 18(1), 24-31.
6. 李紓.(2011).胡漢民贈李曉生詩(shī)及李曉生《往事》詩(shī)一首[J].國史研究通訊.1: 160-165.
7. 杜雪蕾？，許潔虹，蘇寅，李紓.(2012). 用文字概率衡量不確定性：特征和問(wèn)題[J].心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展. 20(5): 651–661.
8. 汪祚軍, 李紓. (2012). 對整合模型和占優(yōu)啟發(fā)式模型的檢驗：基于信息加工過(guò)程的眼動(dòng)研究證據[J]. 心理學(xué)報. 44(2): 179-198.
9. 汪祚軍，李紓，房野. (2011). 再探究不確定狀態(tài)下違背“確定事件”原則的原因[J]. 心理科學(xué).34（6）：1463-1468.
10. 孫紅月，蘇寅，周坤，李紓.(2011). 從風(fēng)險決策中的多次博弈到單次博弈：量變還是質(zhì)變？[J].心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展. 19(10): 1417-1425.
11. 李紓, 許潔虹, 葉先寶. (2011). 中文表達者的“溝通模式偏愛(ài)悖論”與“下情上達評價(jià)悖論”[J].管理評論. 23(9): 102-108.
12. 李紓.(2011). 預期理論還是占優(yōu)啟發(fā)式？第三只眼看風(fēng)險決策.In 周仁來(lái)等(Eds.), 心理學(xué)研究新進(jìn)展（第一輯）. 北京: 北京師范大學(xué)出版社. pp70-85.
13. 唐輝，孫紅月，李紓. (2011). 非常規突發(fā)事件應急決策的研究述評急新思路--發(fā)展指導性模型[J]. 人類(lèi)工效學(xué). 17(1): 78-82.
14. 李紓，畢研玲，蘇寅，饒儷琳. (2011). 厭而避額外之“利”；喜而趨額外之“害”[J].心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展.19(1), 9–17.
15. 劉歡, 李紓. (2010). 實(shí)證研究中金錢(qián)刺激的作用以及存在的問(wèn)題[J]. 人類(lèi)工效學(xué). 16(4), 40-43.
16. 孫悅, 周坤, 畢研玲, 黃貴海, 李紓. (2010). 個(gè)體參賭意愿跨情境特殊性分析[J]. 中華行為醫學(xué)與腦科學(xué)雜志. 19(11): 1012-1015.
17. 梁竹苑、周媛、饒儷琳、李紓.(2010年7月29日).神經(jīng)經(jīng)濟學(xué)：探索人類(lèi)決策行為的神經(jīng)基礎.中國社會(huì )科學(xué)報,第12版.
18. 李紓，饒儷琳，許潔虹. (2010). 冒風(fēng)險的決策者：聰明乎？糊涂乎？[J].上海管理科學(xué). 32(3),32-37.
19. 汪祚軍, 歐創(chuàng )巍，李紓. (2010). 整合模型還是啟發(fā)式模型？從齊當別模型視角進(jìn)行的檢驗[J]. 心理學(xué)報.42(8),821-833.
20. 李紓. (2010). 行為研究所關(guān)心的實(shí)證方法——問(wèn)題與解答[J]. 心理學(xué)報. 42(1),1-3.
21. 蘇寅，畢研玲, 李紓，饒儷琳. (2010). “避害”還是“趨害”？[J].心理科學(xué), 33(2), 506-508.
22. 陳衛偉，李南，李紓. (2010).從新加坡晚晴園到南京臨時(shí)大總統府—1906～1912年間李曉生與孫中山之形影[J].文化雜誌(澳門(mén)).76,1-6.
23. 沈蕾，李紓. (2010). 也說(shuō)福州方言中的“蠻”[J].現代語(yǔ)文(語(yǔ)言研究版).(3),101.
24. 徐麗娟, 梁竹苑, 王坤, 李紓, 蔣田仔.（2009）.跨期選擇的神經(jīng)機制:從折扣未來(lái)獲益到折扣未來(lái)?yè)p失[J]. 中國基礎科學(xué), (06), 25-27.
25. 李紓,李巖梅,時(shí)勘,鄭蕊.(2010). 社會(huì )認知與經(jīng)濟行為. In 黎岳庭 & 劉力(Eds.), 社會(huì )認知：了解自己和他人. 北京: 北京師范大學(xué)出版社.
26. 孫悅, 李紓. (2009). 澳門(mén)人的風(fēng)險知覺(jué)與賭博行為. In 程惕潔 (Ed.) 澳門(mén)人文社會(huì )科學(xué)研究文選？社會(huì )卷. 北京: 社會(huì )科學(xué)文獻出版社.
27. 梁哲, 許潔虹, 李紓, 孫彥, 劉長(cháng)江, 葉先寶. (2009).突發(fā)公共安全事件的風(fēng)險溝通難題--從心理學(xué)角度的觀(guān)察. In 高全喜 (Ed.) 大國策：通向大國之路的中國策 全球視野中的公共安全. 北京: 人民日報出版社.
28. 李紓. (2009). 福州方言與馬來(lái)語(yǔ)第一人稱(chēng)“我”之比較[J].現代語(yǔ)文(語(yǔ)言研究版).(12),92.
29. 李躍然，李紓. (2009). 決策者-建議者系統模型的回顧與前瞻[J].心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展. 17(5), 1026-1032.（被《新華文摘》全文轉載）
30. 劉歡，梁竹苑, 李紓. (2009). 得失程數的變化:損失規避現象的新視點(diǎn)[J]. 心理學(xué)報. 41(12),1123-1132.
31. 饒儷琳, 梁竹苑, 李紓. (2009). 迫選規則體驗法：檢驗規范性和描述性風(fēng)險決策理論的新嘗試[J].心理學(xué)報.41(8),726-736.
32. 白新文, 任孝鵬, 鄭蕊, 李紓. (2009). 四川災區民眾社會(huì )心理狀態(tài)研究. In 張侃, 張建新 (Eds.), 5.12災后心理援助行動(dòng)紀實(shí): 服務(wù)與探索. 北京: 科學(xué)出版社.
33. 李紓 (2009). 風(fēng)險決策學(xué)科發(fā)展研究. In 中國科學(xué)技術(shù)協(xié)會(huì ) (Ed.), 2008-2009心理學(xué)學(xué)科發(fā)展報告. 北京: 中國科學(xué)技術(shù)出版社. ISBN: 978-7-5046-4933-1.
34. 白新文，任孝鵬, 鄭蕊，李紓. (2009). 5.12汶川地震災區居民的心理和諧狀況及與政府滿(mǎn)意度的關(guān)系[J]. 心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展. 17(3), 574-578.
35. 李紓，劉歡，白新文，任孝鵬, 鄭蕊，李金珍，饒儷琳，汪祚軍. (2009). 汶川“5.12”地震中的“心理臺風(fēng)眼”效應[J]. 科技導報, 27(3), 87-89.
36. （美）Jonathan Baron 著(zhù) 思維與決策（第4版）李紓、梁竹苑 主譯[M].北京: 中國輕工業(yè)出版社，2009. ISBN: 9787501968091.
37. 劉歡，梁竹苑, 李紓. (2009). 行為經(jīng)濟學(xué)中的損失規避[J].心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展.17(4), 788-794.
38. 李紓，畢研玲，梁竹苑，孫彥，汪祚軍，鄭蕊. (2009). 無(wú)限理性還是有限理性？——齊當別抉擇模型在經(jīng)濟行為中的應用[J]. 管理評論. 21(5), 103-114.
39. 許潔虹, 李紓. (2008). 英語(yǔ)文字的概率表達[J]. 經(jīng)濟數學(xué), 25(1), 101-111.
40. 李金珍, 李紓, 許潔虹. (2008). 災難事件后繼風(fēng)險決策[J]. 中國安全科學(xué)學(xué)報, 18(4),37-43.
41. 汪祚軍, 李紓. (2008).行為決策中的分離效應[J]. 心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展，16(4),513-517.
42. 畢研玲, 丁見(jiàn)略, 李紓. (2008). 目擊者信心與正確率關(guān)系及影響因素[J]. 人類(lèi)工效學(xué), 14(3)，65-68.
43. 畢研玲, 劉釗, 李紓. (2008). 群體決策與個(gè)體決策過(guò)分自信的研究[J]. 人類(lèi)工效學(xué),14(4), 49-52,77.
44. 饒儷琳, 梁竹苑, 李紓. (2008). 行為決策中的后悔[J].心理科學(xué), 31,1185-1188.
45. 梁哲, 許潔虹, 李紓, 孫彥, 劉長(cháng)江, 葉先寶. (2008).突發(fā)公共安全事件的風(fēng)險溝通難題--從心理學(xué)角度的觀(guān)察[J]. 自然災害學(xué)報，17(2), 25-30.
46. 葉先寶, 李紓. (2008). 公共服務(wù)動(dòng)機：內涵、檢驗途徑與展望[J]. 公共管理學(xué)報, 5(1), 56-60.
47. 梁哲, 李紓, 許潔虹. (2007). 預期理論權重函數π的由來(lái)、質(zhì)疑及Tversky的闡釋[J]. 經(jīng)濟數學(xué), 24(4), 331-340.
48. 許潔虹, 李紓. (2007). 漢語(yǔ)文字概率表達之數值轉換的探索性研究[J]. 人類(lèi)工效學(xué), 13(4), 15-18.
49. 孫彥, 李紓, 王詠. (2007). 促銷(xiāo)的心理行為研究綜述[J]. 人類(lèi)工效學(xué), 13(4), 48-50.
50. 李紓, 謝曉非等. (2007). 行為決策理論之父：紀念Edwards教授2周年忌辰[J]. 應用心理學(xué), 17(2), 99-107.(被中國人民大學(xué)書(shū)報資料中心復印資料全文轉載)
51. 孫彥, 殷曉莉, 李紓. (2007). 預期理論的提出、演進(jìn)及危機[J]. 應用心理學(xué), 17(2), 168-173.
52. 梁哲, 李紓, 李巖梅, 劉長(cháng)江. (2007). 幸福感預測中影響偏差的產(chǎn)生[J]. 中國心理衛生雜志, 21(10), 693-695.
53. 孫彥, 李紓, 殷曉莉. (2007). 決策與推理的雙系統——啟發(fā)式系統和分析系統[J]. 心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展, 15(5), 721-845.
54. 李巖梅, 李紓, 王詠. (2007). 認知與動(dòng)機因素對品牌信息處理的影響[J]. 心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展, 15(4), 674-681.
55. 畢研玲, 李紓. (2007). 有限理性的“占優(yōu)啟發(fā)式”和“齊當別”決策模型的作為 — 當Allais悖論杠桿撬動(dòng)了期望效用理論[J]. 心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展, 15(4), 682-688.
56. 李巖梅, 劉長(cháng)江, 李紓. (2007). 認知、動(dòng)機、情感因素對談判行為的影響[J]. 心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展, 15(3), 511-517.
57. 劉長(cháng)江, 李紓. (2007). 神經(jīng)經(jīng)濟學(xué)：邁向腦科學(xué)的決策科學(xué)[J]. 心理科學(xué), 30(2), 482-484.
58. 劉長(cháng)江, 李巖梅, 李紓. (2007). 實(shí)驗社會(huì )心理學(xué)中的社會(huì )困境[J]. 心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展, 15(2), 379-384.
59. 李紓. (2006). 發(fā)展中的行為決策研究[J]. 心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展, 14(4), 490-496.
60. 高利蘋(píng), 李紓, 時(shí)勘. (2006). 從對框架效應的分析看風(fēng)險決策的神經(jīng)基礎[J]. 心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展, 14(6), 859-865.
61. 于窈, 李紓. (2006). “過(guò)分自信”的研究及其跨文化差異[J]. 心理科學(xué)進(jìn)展, 14(3), 468-474.
62. 李紓, 許潔虹, 梁哲, 施維, 李巖梅. (2005). 1988、2002和2005年度諾貝爾經(jīng)濟學(xué)獎得主以及心理學(xué)界對Savage確定事件原則（sure-thing principle）的研究[J]. 管理評論, 17(11), 10-18.
63. 李紓. (2005). 確定、不確定及風(fēng)險狀態(tài)下選擇反轉:“齊當別”選擇方式的解釋(英文)[J]. 心理學(xué)報, 37(4), 427-433.
64. 孫悅, 李紓. (2005). 澳門(mén)人的風(fēng)險知覺(jué)與賭博行為[J]. 心理學(xué)報, 37(2), 260-267.
65. 李紓. (2003). 論閩方言及其演變[J]. 浙江大學(xué)學(xué)報（人文社會(huì )科學(xué)版），33(3), 65-73.
66. 李紓. (2001). 艾勒悖論（Allais Paradox）另釋[J]. 心理學(xué)報, 33(2), 176-181.
67. 李紓. (2001). 辛亥年間同盟會(huì )員在倫敦活動(dòng)補錄[J]. 史學(xué)月刊, 6, 123-127.
68. 李紓, 房永青, 張迅捷. (2000). 再探框架對風(fēng)險決策行為的影響[J]. 心理學(xué)報, 32(2), 229-234.
69. Du, X-L., Liu, S-H., Xu, J-H.,Rao, L-L., Jiang, C-M.,&Li, S. (2013). When uncertainty meets life: the effect of animacy on probability expression. Judgment and Decision Making.8(4), 425-438.
70. Rao, L-L., Liu, X-N., Li, Q., Zhou, Y., Liang, Z-Y., Sun, H-Y., Zhou, R-L., &Li, S. (2013).Toward a mental arithmetic process in risky choices.Brain and Cognition. 83(3), 307–314. (2011 Ranking: 12 of 84 in Psychology - Experimental; 5-year Impact Factor: 3.495; Acceptance: 32%)DOI:10.1016/j.bandc.2013.09.009
71. Sun, H-Y.,Rao, L-L.,Zhou, K.,&Li, S. (Online17 Jul 2013). Formulating an emergency plan based on expectation-maximization is one thing, but applying it to a single case is another. Journal of Risk Research.(2012 Impact Factor: 1.240; Ranking: 17/92 (Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary); Acceptance: %)DOI:10.1080/13669877.2013.816333
72. Jiang, C-M, Zheng, R, Zhou, Y, Liang, Z-Y, Rao, L-L, Sun, Y, Tan, C, Chen, X-P, Tian, Z-Q, Bai, Y-Q, Chen, S-G, Li, S. (2013). Effect of 45-day simulated microgravity on the evaluation of orally reported emergencies. Ergonomics. 56(8), 1225-1231. DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2013.809481 (SJR 2011 Ranking: 3 of 15 in Ergonomics; 2012 Impact Factor: 1.674; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.831)
73. Su, Y., Rao, L-L., Sun, H-Y., Du, X-L., Li, X., &Li, S. (on line). Is making a risky choice based on a weighting and adding process? An eye-tracking investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. （SCI/SSCI 索引）(2011 Ranking:: 18 of 84 in Psychology - Experimental; 2012 Impact Factor: 2.918; 5-year Impact Factor: 3.745; Acceptance: 23%)
74. Bi, Y-L., Du, X-L., &Li, S. (2013).Peer comparison overconfidence: Does it measure bias in self-evaluation? PsyCh Journal. 2(1), 17-25.
75. Su, Y., Zheng, Y., & Li, S. (2012). Culture, distance, and threat perception:Comment on Stamps (2011). Perceptual & Motor Skills. 115(3), 752-754.
76. Su, Y., Rao, L-L., Li, X., Wang, Y., & Li, S. (2012). From quality to quantity: The role of common feature in consumer preference. Journal of Economic Psychology.33(6), 1043–1058. (2012Impact Factor: 1.081,5-year Impact Factor1.749; Acceptance: 22%)
77. Li, S., Li, Y-R., Su, Y.,& Rao, L-L. (2012). Is an idea different from cake: can you have it and eat it, too? A violation of permanence in information consumption?.PLoS ONE.7(7): e41490. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041490.
78. Rao, L-L.,Li, S., Jiang, T-Z.,& Zhou, Y. (2012). Is payoff necessarily weighted by probability when making a risky choice? Evidence from functional connectivity analysis. PLoS ONE.7(7): e41048. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041048.
79. Sun, Y., Li, S.,Bonini, N.&Su, Y. (2012). Graph framing effects in decision making.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 25(5), 491–501. (CA; 2011 Ranking: 9/72 in Psychology, Applied; 2011 Impact Factor: 2.842)
80. Li, S., Jiang, C-M, Dunn, J. C.,& Wang, Z.-J. (2012). A test of “reason-based” and “reluctance-to-think” accounts of the disjunction effect. Information Sciences.184(1), 166-175. (2010 Ranking:10/128 in Computer Science, Information Systems; 2012 Impact Factor: 3.643; 5-year Impact Factor: 3.676)
81. Wang, Z.-J., Li, S., & Jiang, C-M., (2012). Emotional response in a disjunction condition. Journal of Economic Psychology. 33(1), 71-78.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 72/305 in Economics, 46/120 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.358; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.749)
82. Zhou, K., Tang, H., Sun, Y., Huang, G-H., Rao, L-L., Liang, Z-Y.,&Li, S.(2012). Believe in luck or in skill: which locks people into gambling?Journal of Gambling Studies.28(3), 379-391. (CA; 2010 Ranking: 50/120 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.303; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.881) 1.469
83. Li, S., Wang, Z-J., Rao,L-L.,Zheng,R., Ren,X-P.,Li, J-Z.,Liu, H., Bi, Y-L., Wang, F.,&Bai, X-W.(2011). How long is long enough: Public worry about the devastated students' academic career since Wenchuan Earthquake.Psychologia. 54, 80-86.(2010 Ranking: 74/81 in Psychology, Experimental; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.581; 5-year Impact Factor: 0.675)
84. Li, J-Z., Li, S., & Liu, H. (2011).How has the Wenchuan Earthquake influenced people’s intertemporal choices? Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 41(11), 2739–2752. (CA; 2010 Ranking: 49/58 in Psychology, Social; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.721; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.21)
85. Sun, Y., Wang, F., & Li, S.(2011).Higher height, higher ability: Judgment confidence as a function of spatial height perception. PLoS ONE.6(7): e22125.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022125(co-CA; 2010 Ranking: 12/86 in Biology; 2010 Impact Factor: 4.411; 5-year Impact Factor: 4.610)
86. Sun, Y., &Li, S. (2011). Testing the effect of risk on intertemporal choice in the Chinese cultural context. Journal of Social Psychology. 151(4), 517–522.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 50/58 in Psychology, Social; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.691; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.1)
87. Rao, L-L., Zhou, Y., Xu, L-J., Liang, Z-Y., Jiang, T-Z., &Li, S. (2011). Are riskychoices actually guided by a compensatory process? New insights from fMRI. PLoS ONE. 6(3): e14756.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0014756(CA; 2010 Ranking: 12/86 in Biology; 2010 Impact Factor: 4.411; 5-year Impact Factor: 4.610)
88. Li, Q., Qin, S., Rao, L-L., Zhang, W., Ying, X., Guo, X., Guo, C., Ding, J., Li, S., &Luo, J.(2011).Can Sophie's choice be adequately captured by cold computation of minimizing losses? An fMRI study of vital loss decisions. PLoS ONE. 6(3): e17544. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017544(CA; 2010 Ranking: 12/86 in Biology; 2010 Impact Factor: 4.411; 5-year Impact Factor: 4.610)
89. Rao, L-L. &Li, S. (2011). New paradoxes in intertemporal choice. Judgment and Decision Making. 6(2), 122-129.(2011 Ranking: 17/124 in PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY; 2011 Impact Factor: 2.620; 5-year Impact Factor: 2.623)
90. Li, S., Bi, Y-L., Su, Y., & Rao, L-L. (2011).An additional gain can make you feel bad and an additional loss can make you feel good. Advances in Psychological Science. 19(1), 9-17.
91. Li, S., Bi, Y-L., & Rao, L-L. (2011). Every Science/Nature potter praises his ownpot ― Can we believe what he says based on hismother tongue?Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 42(1), 125-130.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 15/58 in Psychology, Social; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.857; 5-year Impact Factor: 2.498)Impact Factor: 1.418Ranked: 24 out of 59 in Psychology, Social
92. Rao, L-L., Han, R., Ren, X.-P., Bai, X.-W., Zheng, R., Liu, H.,Wang, Z.-J., Li, J.-Z., Zhang, K.,&Li, S. (2011). Disadvantage and prosocial behavior: The effects of the Wenchuan earthquake. Evolution and Human Behavior.32(1),63-69. (CA; 2010 Ranking: 2/14 in Psychology, Biological, 2/34 in Social Sciences, Biomedical; 2012 Impact Factor: 3.946; 5-year Impact Factor: 4.249)(ranked 4th out of 37 journals in the ISI SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL category and also 4th out of 14 journals in the ISI PSYCHOLOGY category*.2011 Impact Factor3.113)
93. Li, Y.M., Murata,K., &Li, S. (2010). Better safe than sorry: situational correction in interpersonal competition. Social Cognition. 28(4), 465-489.(2010 Ranking: 17/58 in Psychology, Social; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.76; 5-year Impact Factor: 2.408)
94. Sun, Y., Li, S.,&Bonini, N.(2010). Attribute salience in graphical representations affects evaluation. Judgment and Decision Making. 5(3), 151-158.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 35/120 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary;2010 Impact Factor: 1.632; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.79)
95. Li, S., Rao, L-L., Bai, X-W., Zheng, R., Ren, X-P., Li, J-Z., Wang, Z-J., Liu, H.,& Zhang, K. (2010). Progression of the “Psychological Typhoon Eye” and variations since the Wenchuan earthquake. PLoS ONE. 5(3): e9727. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0009727(co-CA; 2010 Ranking: 12/86 in Biology; 2010 Impact Factor: 4.411; 5-year Impact Factor: 4.610)
96. Li, S., Wang, Z-J., Rao, L-L., & Li, Y.M. (2010). Is there a violation ofSavage’s sure-thing principle in the prisoner’s dilemma game? Adaptive Behavior. 18, 377-385. (2010 Ranking: 18/84 in Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary; 2012 Impact Factor: 1.113; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.545
97. Sun, Y., & Li, S. (2010). The effect of risk on intertemporal choice.Journal of Risk Research.13(6), 805–820.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 26/84 in Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.946)2011 Impact Factor: 0.880 Ranking: 33/89 (Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary)
98. Li, S., Su, Y.,&Sun, Y. (2010). The effect of pseudo-immediacy on intertemporal choices. Journal of Risk Research. 13(6), 781–787.(2010 Ranking: 26/84 in Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.946)
99. Li, J-Z., Li, S., Wang, W-Z.,Rao, L-L., & Liu, H. (2011). Are people alwaysmore risk averse after disasters? Surveys after a heavy snow-hit and a major earthquake in China in 2008. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 25(1), 104–111.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 48/81 in Psychology, Experimental; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.626; 5-year Impact Factor: 2.072)
100. Li, S., Li, J-Z.,Chen, Y-W., Bai, X-W., Ren, X-P., Zheng, R., Rao, L-L., Wang, Z-J., & Liu, H. (2010). Can overconfidence be debiased by low-probability/high-consequence event? Risk Analysis. 30(4), 699-707. (CA; 2012 Ranking: 4/44 in Social Sciences Mathematical Methods; 2012 Impact Factor: 2.278; 5-year Impact Factor:2.468)
101. Li, S., Zhou, K., Sun, Y., Rao, L-L., Zheng, R., &Liang, Z-Y(2010). Anticipatedregret, risk perception, or both: Which is most likely responsible for our intention to gamble? Journal of Gambling Studies. 26(1),105-116.(2010 Ranking: 50/120 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.303; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.881)
102. Li, S., Rao, L-L., Bai, X-W., Ren, X-P., Zheng, R., Li, J-Z., Wang, Z-J., & Liu, H. (2009). Psychological typhoon eye in the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. PLoS ONE 4(3): e4964. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004964(2010 Ranking: 12/86 in Biology; 2010 Impact Factor: 4.411; 5-year Impact Factor: 4.610)
103. Liu, C-J.,&Li. S. (2009). Contextualized self: When the self runs into social dilemmas. International Journal of Psychology. 44(6), 451-458. (2010 Ranking: 60/120 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.067; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.117)
104. Xu, LJ., Liang, ZY, Wang, K., Li, S., & Jiang, TZ. (2009). Neural mechanism of intertemporal choice: From discounting future gains to future losses. Brain Research. 1261, 65-74. (CA; 2010 Ranking:128/239 in Neurosciences; 2010 Impact Factor: 2.623; 5-year Impact Factor: 2.665;Acceptance: 42%)
105. Li, L-B., He, S-H., Li, S., Xu, J-H., &Rao, L-L. (2009). A closer look at the Russian roulette problem: A re-examination of the non-linearity of the prospect theory’s decision weight π.International Journal of Approximate Reasoning. 50(3), 515-520. (CA; 2010 Ranking: 38/108 in Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.684; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.720; 2011 Impact Factor: 1.948; 5-year Impact Factor: 2.155)
106. Li, S., Bi, Y-L. &Zhang, Y. (2009). Asian risk-seeking and overconfidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(11), 2706-2736.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 49/58 in Psychology, Social; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.721; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.21)
107. Han, R., Li, S. & Shi, J.N. (2009). The territorial prior residence effect and children’s behavior in social dilemmas. Environment and Behavior, SAGE Publications-USA. 41(5), 644-657.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 18/78 in Environmental Studies, 25/120, Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.921; 5-year Impact Factor: 2.297)
108. Xu, J-H., Ye, X-B., &Li, S. (2009). Communication mode preference paradox among native Chinese speakers. Journal of Social Psychology, Heldref Publications -USA. 149(1), 125 – 129.(2010 Ranking: 50/58 in Psychology, Social; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.691; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.1)
109. Li, S. &Liu, C-J. (2008). Individual differences in a switch from risk-averse preferences for gains to risk-seeking preferences for losses: Can personality variables predict the risk preferences? Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis-UK. 11(5), 673-686.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 26/84 in Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.946)
110. Sun, Y., Li, S., & Li, Y-M. (2008). Reexamine the role of the description of problem texts in the disjunction effect. Journal of Psychology, Heldref Publications -USA. 142(3), 261 – 265.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 73/120 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.899; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.159)
111. Li, S., Zheng, R., & Li, L-B. (2007). Do shared features of offered alternatives have an effect in consumer choice? Journal of Economic Psychology. 28(6), 658-677.(CA;2010 Ranking: 72/305 in Economics, 46/120 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.358; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.749)
112. Li, S., Sun, Y., & Wang, Y. (2007). 50% off or buy one get one free? Frame preference as a function of consumable nature in dairy products. Journal of Social Psychology, Heldref Publications –USA. 147 (4), 413 - 421.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 50/58 in Psychology, Social; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.691; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.1)
113. Li, S., Taplin, J.E., & Zhang, Y. (2007). The equate-to-differentiate’s way of seeing the prisoner’s dilemma. Information Sciences. 177(6), 1395-1412. (CA; 2010 Ranking:10/128 in Computer Science, Information Systems; 2010 Impact Factor: 2.833; 5-year Impact Factor: 3.005)
114. Li, S. & Li, Y.M.(2007). How far is far enough: A measure of information privacy in terms of interpersonal distance. Environment and Behavior, SAGE Publications-USA. 39(3), 317-331.(2010 Ranking: 18/78 in Environmental Studies, 25/120, Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.921; 5-year Impact Factor: 2.297)Impact Factor: 1.275Ranked: 50 out of 124 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary
115. Li, S. & Liang, Z-Y. (2007). Action/inaction and regret: The moderating effect of closeness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Bellwether Publishing-USA. 37(4), 807-821.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 49/58 in Psychology, Social; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.721; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.21)
116. Li, S. & Xie, X. (2006). A newlook at the “Asian disease” problem: A choice between the best possible outcomes or between the worst possible outcomes? Thinking and Reasoning, Psychology Press-UK. 12(2), 129-143.(2010 Ranking: 72/81 in Psychology, Experimental; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.778; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.213)
117. Li, S. (2006). Preference reversal: A new look at an old problem. Psychological Record, Psychological record-USA. 56 (3), 411-428.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 57/120 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.114; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.006)
118. Li, S., Chen, W-W., & Yu, Y. (2006). The reason for Asian overconfidence. Journal of Psychology, Heldref Publications -USA.140 (6),615-618.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 73/120 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.899; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.159)
119. Li, S., Triandis, H.C., & Yu, Y. (2006). Cultural orientation and corruption. Ethics &Behavior, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates –USA. 16(3), 199-215.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 26/39 in Ethics, 91/120 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.528; 5-year Impact Factor: 0.797)
120. Li, S. (2005). Romantic music activates minds rooted in a particular culture. Journal of Consciousness Studies, Imprint academic -UK. 12(7), 31–37.(SJR 2009 Ranking: Q1(Top 25%) in Philosophy)
121. Chen, X P. & Li, S. (2005). Cross-National differences in cooperative decision making in mixed-motive business contexts: The mediating effect of vertical and horizontal individualism. Journal of International Business Studies,Palgrave Publishers-UK. 36(6), 622-636.(2010 Ranking: 3/103 in Business, 9/144 in Management; 2010 Impact Factor: 4.184; 5-year Impact Factor: 5.539)
122. Li, S. & Lee-Wong, S. M. (2005). A study on Singaporeans’ perception of sexual harassment from a cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Bellwether Publishing-USA. 35(4), 699-717.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 49/58 in Psychology, Social; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.721; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.21)
123. Li, S. (2004-a). A behavioral choice model when computational ability matters. Applied Intelligence, Kluwer-USA. 20(2), 147-163.
124. Li, S. (2004-b). Decision-making of the collectivist family in risk-seeking and overconfidence. In Kashima, Y., Endo, Y., Kashima, E., Leung, C., and McClure, J. (Eds.), Progress in Asian Social Psychology, 4, 263-288. Seoul, Korea: Kyoyook-kwahak-sa.
125. Li, S. (2004-c). An alternative way of seeing the Allais-type violations of the sure-thing principle. Humanomics, Barmarick Publications-UK. 20(1&2), 17-31.
126. Li, S. (2004-d). Equate-to-differentiate approach: An application in binary choice under uncertainty, Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer-Germany. 12(3), 269-294.
127. Li, S., & Fang, Y. (2004). Respondents in Asian cultures (e.g., Chinese) are more risk-seeking and more overconfident than respondents in other cultures (e.g., in United States) but the reciprocal predictions are in total opposition: How and why? Journal of Cognition and Culture, Brill Academic Publishers - The Netherlands. 4(2), 263-292.(SJR 2009 Ranking: Q1(Top 25%) in Cultural Studies)
128. Li, S. (2003-a). Violations of conjoint independence in binary choices: The equate-to-differentiate interpretation, European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier-The Netherlands. 148, 65-79.(2009 Ranking: 10/73 = 13.70% in Operations Research & Management Science; 2009 Impact Factor: 2.093; 2010 Impact Factor: 2.158; Acceptance: 22%)
129. Li, S. (2003-b). The role of expected value illustrated in decision-making under risk: single-play vs multiple-play. Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis-UK. 6(2), 113-124.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 26/84 in Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.946)
130. Li, S. (2002). Do money-earning time and money-exchanging route matter? Psychology and Marketing, Wiley-USA. 19(9), 777-782.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 50/103 in Business, 29/69 in Psychology, Applied; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.385; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.934)
131. Li, S. &Taplin, J.E. (2002). Examining whether there is a disjunction effect in Prisoner’s Dilemma Games. Chinese Journal of Psychology, Taiwan. 44(1), 25-46.
132. Li, S., & Fang, Y. (2002). Are Kiasuism and Singapore 21 diametrically opposed in influencing Singaporeans’ decision-making? Psychologia, PsychologiaSociety-Japan. 45(1), 34-45.(2010 Ranking: 74/81 in Psychology, Experimental; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.581; 5-year Impact Factor: 0.675)
133. Li, S. (2002). An evaluation of traditional English-Chinese translation criteria for Internet-related technological terms: A study using multivariate analyses. Journal of Translation Studies, Hong Kong. 7, 45-58.
134. Li, S. (2001). How closeis tooclose? A comparison of proxemic reactions of Singaporean Chinese to male intruders of four ethnicities. Perceptual and Motor Skills. Ammons Scientific-USA. 93, 124-126.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 77/81 in Psychology, Experimental; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.492; 5-year Impact Factor: 0.566)
135. Li, S. (2001). Extended research on dominance violations in similarity judgments: The equate-to-differentiate interpretation. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, Korean Association for Thinking-South Korea. 11(1), 13-38.
136. Li, S. (2001). Equate-to-differentiate: The role ofshared and unique features in the judgment process. Australian Journal of Psychology, APS-Australia. 53(2), 109-118.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 83/120 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.644; 5-year Impact Factor: 0.922)
137. Li, S. & Taplin, J.E. (2001). A test of independence axiom in diagnosis context that offers common symptom.Psychologia, PsychologiaSociety-Japan. 44(3), 188-196.(2010 Ranking: 74/81 in Psychology, Experimental; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.581; 5-year Impact Factor: 0.675)
138. Li, S. (1999). One country two systems: A psychological perspective. Psychology and Developing Societies, Sage-India. 11(2), 157-177.
139. Li, S. (1998-a). Can the conditions governing the framing effect be determined? Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier-The Netherlands. 19, 133-153. (CA; 2010 Ranking: 72/305 in Economics, 46/120 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.358; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.749)
140. Li, S. (1998-b). Tian Ji and Chariot-racing: Violation of dominance in similarity judgment of Chinese characters. Psychologia, PsychologiaSociety-Japan. 41, 20-31.(CA; 2010 Ranking: 74/81 in Psychology, Experimental; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.581; 5-year Impact Factor: 0.675)
141. Li, S. (1996-a). An additional violation of transitivity and independence between alternatives. Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier-The Netherlands. 17, 645-650. (CA; 2010 Ranking: 72/305 in Economics, 46/120 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.358; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.749)
142. Li, S. (1996-b). What is the price for utilizing deductive reasoning? A reply to generalized expectation maximizers. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Elsevier-The Netherlands. 29(2), 355-358.
143. Li, S. (1995). Is there a decision weight p? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Elsevier-The Netherlands. 27(3), 453-463.
144. Li, S., & Adams, A. S. (1995). Is there something more important behind framing? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 62, 216-219. (CA; 2010 Ranking: 36/144 in Management, 11/69 in Psychology, Applied, 6/58 in Psychology, Social; 2010 Impact Factor: 2.48; 5-year Impact Factor: 3.586)
145. Li, S., Zhu, Z., & Adams, A. S. (1995). An exploratory study of arm-reach reaction time and eye-hand coordination. Ergonomics, Taylor & Francis-UK. 38 (4) 637-650. (2010 Ranking: 4/14 in Ergonomics, 30/69 in Psychology, Applied; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.377; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.779)
146. Li, S. (1994-a). What is the role of transparency in cancellation? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Academic-USA. 60, 353-366. (2010 Ranking: 36/144 in Management, 11/69 in Psychology, Applied, 6/58 in Psychology, Social; 2010 Impact Factor: 2.48; 5-year Impact Factor: 3.586)
147. Li, S. (1994-b). Is there a problem with preference reversals? Psychological Reports, Ammons Scientific-USA. 74, 675-679. (2010 Ranking: 96/120 in Psychology, Multidisciplinary; 2010 Impact Factor: 0.439; 5-year Impact Factor: 0.446)
148. Li, S. (1993). What is wrong withAllais' certainty effect? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Wiley-UK. 6, 271-281.(2010 Ranking: 24/69 in Psychology, Applied; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.672; 5-year Impact Factor: 2.409)
149. Li, S., & Xi, Z. (1990). The measurement of functional arm reach envelopes for young Chinese males. Ergonomics, Taylor & Francis-UK. 33(7), 967-978. (2010 Ranking: 4/14 in Ergonomics, 30/69 in Psychology, Applied; 2010 Impact Factor: 1.377; 5-year Impact Factor: 1.779)
Li, S. (1994). “Equate-to-differentiate theory: A coherent bi-choice model across certainty, uncertainty and risk,” (Doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, 1994). Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: the Sciences & Engineering. Vol 55(4-B), 1658.
2011年度國家社會(huì )科學(xué)基金重大項目《突發(fā)公共事件輿情應對與效果評估信息平臺建設研究》（80萬(wàn)）
子課題負責人 鄭昱
2010年中國科學(xué)院研究生科技創(chuàng )新資助專(zhuān)項（2.5萬(wàn)元）
《情感強度與風(fēng)險決策：大喜大悲的人傾向于規避損失》 唐輝
2009年中國科學(xué)院研究生科技創(chuàng )新資助專(zhuān)項 （2萬(wàn)元）：
《共享特征效應的深入研究——從“質(zhì)”到“量”，從行為實(shí)驗到眼動(dòng)研究》 蘇寅
2007年度中國科學(xué)院研究生科學(xué)與社會(huì )實(shí)踐資助專(zhuān)項創(chuàng )新研究類(lèi)項目（2萬(wàn)元）
《風(fēng)險決策中獲益與損失不對稱(chēng)的腦機制研究》 饒儷琳